Ig. Stiell et al., Canadian CT head rule study for patients with minor head injury: Methodology for phase II (validation and economic analysis), ANN EMERG M, 38(3), 2001, pp. 317-322
Prospective validation on a new set of patients is an essential test of a n
ew decision rule. However, many clinical decision rules are not prospective
ly assessed to determine their accuracy, reliability, clinical sensibility,
or potential impact on practice. This validation process is important beca
use many statistically derived rules or guidelines do not perform well when
tested in a new population. The methodologic standards for a validation st
udy are similar to those described in the article on phase I for derivation
studies in the August 2001 issue of Annals of Emergency Medicine. The goal
of phase II is to prospectively assess the accuracy, reliability, and acce
ptability of the decision rule in a new set of patients with minor head inj
ury. This will determine the clinical utility of the rule and is essential
if such a rule is to be widely adopted into clinical practice.