The performance of the Phase Metrics DFHT IV (DFHT) fly height tester was c
ompared with the performance of the Zygo Pegasus 2000 (P2000) fly height te
ster. The testers showed comparable repeatabilities (0.25 mn for the DFHT a
nd 0.30 nm for the P2000) and correlated well at all points except at the c
enter rail trailing edge. The DFHT had a measurement uncertainty of 0.76 ru
n at a fly height of 25 nm and 0.35 nm near contact. Similarly the P2000 ex
hibited an uncertainty of 1 nm at 25 nm and 0.5 run at contact. The measure
ment uncertainty of the DFHT is due to calibration at a location different
from the measurement location; for the P2000, it is primarily due to residu
al uncertainty in the correction for stress-induced birefringence in the te
st disk. The P2000 did not recognize the presence of small diamondlike carb
on bumps on the air bearing surface. There was a consistent 3-nm absolute o
ffset between the fly height measurements of the two testers. Neither teste
r possessed a clear advantage over the other in the approaching era of near
-contact recording. (C) 2001 Optical Society of America.