Comparison of the Phase Metrics DFHT IV and Zygo Pegasus 2000 fly height testers

Citation
Cw. Strunk et al., Comparison of the Phase Metrics DFHT IV and Zygo Pegasus 2000 fly height testers, APPL OPTICS, 40(25), 2001, pp. 4507-4513
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Apllied Physucs/Condensed Matter/Materiales Science","Optics & Acoustics
Journal title
APPLIED OPTICS
ISSN journal
00036935 → ACNP
Volume
40
Issue
25
Year of publication
2001
Pages
4507 - 4513
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-6935(20010901)40:25<4507:COTPMD>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
The performance of the Phase Metrics DFHT IV (DFHT) fly height tester was c ompared with the performance of the Zygo Pegasus 2000 (P2000) fly height te ster. The testers showed comparable repeatabilities (0.25 mn for the DFHT a nd 0.30 nm for the P2000) and correlated well at all points except at the c enter rail trailing edge. The DFHT had a measurement uncertainty of 0.76 ru n at a fly height of 25 nm and 0.35 nm near contact. Similarly the P2000 ex hibited an uncertainty of 1 nm at 25 nm and 0.5 run at contact. The measure ment uncertainty of the DFHT is due to calibration at a location different from the measurement location; for the P2000, it is primarily due to residu al uncertainty in the correction for stress-induced birefringence in the te st disk. The P2000 did not recognize the presence of small diamondlike carb on bumps on the air bearing surface. There was a consistent 3-nm absolute o ffset between the fly height measurements of the two testers. Neither teste r possessed a clear advantage over the other in the approaching era of near -contact recording. (C) 2001 Optical Society of America.