Background The efficacy of topical therapy depends on the patient spreading
the topical drug in an even layer to give a standard dose. Ointments are b
elieved to be more effective than creams and solutions.
Objectives To compare the application and spreading of four different pharm
aceutical vehicles.
Methods Twenty-nine healthy volunteers applied a fixed amount (0.1 g) of so
lution (S), ointment (O), cream (C) and low-viscosity cream (LVC) to the ab
dominal skin. Area of spread, skin surface lipids (dependent on formulation
) and changes in skin surface temperature (cooling due to evaporation of fo
rmulation water/alcohol) were measured.
Results Area of spread: O = C = LVC = S. Skin surface lipids: O > C > LVC >
S. Difference in skin surface lipids between centre and periphery: O < C =
LVC = S. Cooling: O < C = LVC < S.
Conclusions The four formulations were spread to similar areas. The ointmen
t was spread evenly in the treated area while the other formulations were u
nevenly spread, with a lower dose in the periphery. Creams and solutions ha
ve disadvantages as vehicles, as rapid evaporation of formulation water/alc
ohol, measured as cooling, influences spread, resulting in an uneven topica
l dose within the treated area. In contrast. ointment is evenly spread and
is thus a more appropriate formulation. Patients should be instructed to ap
ply creams and solutions to multiple sites and to spread them quickly.