The significance of fragrance mix, balsam of Peru, colophony and propolis as screening tools in the detection of fragrance allergy

Citation
S. Wohrl et al., The significance of fragrance mix, balsam of Peru, colophony and propolis as screening tools in the detection of fragrance allergy, BR J DERM, 145(2), 2001, pp. 268-273
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology,"da verificare
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
00070963 → ACNP
Volume
145
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
268 - 273
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0963(200108)145:2<268:TSOFMB>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Background Patch testing to fragrances is an important step in the diagnosi s of fragrance allergy. Objectives To determine the usefulness of adding propolis to the European s tandard series to test for fragrance allergy. Patients and methods A total of 2660 consecutive patients were patch tested with a standard patch test series: 747 suspected of fragrance allergy were tested further with a special fragrance series. Results The positive results to the standard series in 2660 patients were: fragrance mix 243 (9.1%), Myroxylon Pereirae [balsam of Peru] 144 (5.4%), c olophony 32 (1.2%): these fragrance mixtures are used as screening substanc es for fragrance allergy in the European standard series. Propolis, also kn own as bee's glue, was also an important allergen in this locally revised s tandard series (n = 35, 1.3%). Positive reactions to the aforementioned all ergens were associated significantly among each other (P < 0.01. chi (2)-te st) and did not differ between the sexes. The primary locations of dermatit is in patients with a positive test to one or more fragrance allergens (it = 162) among those suspected of fragrance allergy (n = 747) were: face 46.9 %, hands 23.5%, neck 17.9%, axillae 12.3%: 92 of the 747 patients suspected of fragrance allergy had positive skin tests to the special fragrance seri es comprising the eight constituents of the fragrance mix (most frequent: i soeugenol 5.4%. oakmoss absolute 5.0%, eugenol 2.5%) and 14 other fragrance allergens (most frequent: clove oil 1.6%. lemon grass oil 0.8%. cedar wood oil 0.7%). The additional value of propolis as another screening substance for fragrance allergy in these patients was low. The likelihood of a react ion to one or more of the extra fragrance allergens increased with the numb er of reactions to fragrance screening allergens in the standard series. Conclusions The number of positive reactions to fragrance screening allerge ns in a standard patch test series may be used as a rule of thumb for predi cting a positive outcome of a more detailed testing to fragrances. Propolis is an important allergen in its own right but its value as a screening sub stance for fragrance allergy is limited.