P. Bhargava et al., Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of two sequences of gemcitabine and docetaxel administered weekly to patients with advanced cancer, CANC CHEMOT, 48(2), 2001, pp. 95-103
Purpose: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxic
ity (DLT), and effect of drug sequence on toxicities and pharmacokinetics o
f the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel. Methods: A total of 34 pati
ents with advanced cancers were treated with gemcitabine and docetaxel on d
ays 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle according to the following dose escalation
schedule: level 1, 800 and 30 mg/m(2), respectively; level 2, 800 and 40 m
g/m(2); level 3, 1000 and 40 mg/m(2); and level 4, 1250 and 40 mg/m(2). At
each dose level, at least three patients were assigned to one of the two se
quences of drug administration: gemcitabine --> docetaxel or docetaxel -->
gemcitabine. Once the MTD had been reached, six additional patients, who ha
d received no more than one chemotherapy regimen, were enrolled to dose lev
els 3 and 4 (gemcitabine --> docetaxel) to determine the MTD in minimally p
retreated patients. Results: Neutropenia was the most frequent DLT with an
overall incidence of 23.5%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 62% of patien
ts (8/13) who had received two or more prior chemotherapy regimens, but not
at all (0/15) in patients who had received no more than one prior chemothe
rapy regimens (P < 0.001). Additional DLTs included grade 4 diarrhea and gr
ade 4 stomatitis in one patient each. The MTD was determined to be gemcitab
ine 800 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 40 mg/m(2) in patients who had received two o
r more prior chemotherapy regimens. However, minimally pretreated patients
(no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen) were able to tolerate higher
doses with an MTD of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 40 mg/m(2). The
re were no significant differences in toxicities or pharmacokinetics betwee
n the two sequences of administration. Partial and minor responses were obs
erved in 23.5% of patients: non-small-cell lung (two of eight), gastric (tw
o of three), head and neck (one of two), bladder (two of four) and hepatoce
llular cancer (one of one). Conclusions: The combination of gemcitabine and
docetaxel administered on days 1 and 8 every 21 days was feasible and well
tolerated in patients with advanced malignancies. The sequence of administ
ration had no significant effect on the toxicity or pharmacokinetics of eit
her drug. Minimally pretreated patients tolerated higher doses of this comb
ination without significant toxicities. This schedule and combination demon
strated activity in a variety of solid tumors, and merits further evaluatio
n.