Acceptance of a published paper may be different as shown on examples from
the author's work. A wrong finding was rebutted (acyl derivatives of oximes
, configuration of hydroximoyl chlorides), a method was accepted but not al
ways followed (isokinetic relationship), a long-term discussion started whi
ch has not been resolved (resonance in nitrobenzene), a work was repeated w
ithout knowledge of the predecessor (acylation of a hydroxylamine derivativ
e) or the paper was accepted but not cited (polyvalent iodine derivatives).
The consequences are discussed from the philosophic, ethical, psychologica
l and scientometric viewpoints.