Comparative tolerability of intravenous azithromycin, clarithromycin and erythromycin in healthy volunteers - Results of a double-blind, double-dummy, four-way crossover study
T. Zimmermann et al., Comparative tolerability of intravenous azithromycin, clarithromycin and erythromycin in healthy volunteers - Results of a double-blind, double-dummy, four-way crossover study, CLIN DRUG I, 21(8), 2001, pp. 527-536
Objective: To compare the tolerability of intravenous azithromycin, clarith
romycin, erythromycin and placebo.
Design: A double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, four-way crossove
r study was conducted in 12 healthy male volunteers. The participants were
randomised to receive I-hour intravenous infusions of azithromycin 500mg (2
mg/ml) once daily, erythromycin 500mg (1 mg/ml) three times daily, clarith
romycin 500mg (2 mg/ml) twice daily, or placebo (normal saline, 500ml) thre
e times daily, with each regimen administered for 3 days. There was a minim
um 4-week washout period before participants switched to an alternative reg
imen, in random sequence, until all four regimens had been completed. Parti
cipants were monitored for infusion site reactions and gastrointestinal (GI
) adverse events.
Results: Clarithromycin caused clinically significant infusion site pain in
92% of the 12 participants evaluated and was exclusively associated with p
hlebitis and inflammation. Areas under score-time curves (AUSs) rating the
intensity of inflammation and pain were significantly higher for clarithrom
ycin compared with azithromycin (p < 0.0005). Erythromycin infusion caused
clinically significant abdominal pain or nausea in 25% of participants. The
AUSs for GI tolerability were significantly different for erythromycin com
pared with azithromycin (p < 0.001). Discontinuation rates due to infusion
site reactions were 0% for azithromycin, 50% for clarithromycin, and 8% eac
h for erythromycin and placebo. Treatment with erythromycin was interrupted
or discontinued as a result of abdominal pain in 17% of patients and as a
result of nausea in 8% of patients.
Conclusions: Intravenous azithromycin had better infusion site tolerability
than clarithromycin and better GI tolerability than erythromycin. The supe
rior tolerability of azithromycin may avoid the discontinuation of intraven
ous antimicrobial therapy in seriously ill patients and assist in reducing
the duration of hospitalisation and the cost of patient management.