The changing role of the hospital in Europe: causes and consequences

Authors
Citation
M. Mckee et J. Healy, The changing role of the hospital in Europe: causes and consequences, CLIN MED, 1(4), 2001, pp. 299-304
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
CLINICAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
14702118 → ACNP
Volume
1
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
299 - 304
Database
ISI
SICI code
1470-2118(200107/08)1:4<299:TCROTH>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
The United Kingdom, faced with a legacy of long-term under investment, has embarked on a major programme of hospital development. This raises many que stions. What factors influence the work of the hospital? How can hospitals continue to adapt to changing circumstances? This paper draws on a recent study of the role of the hospital in Europe. I t identifies major gaps in information about what hospitals do and how they are changing. International comparisons are especially difficult because o f differences in definitions. The challenges that hospitals face can be categorised under three broad hea dings: the health needs of the population; opportunities and constraints th ey face in providing care; and the consequences of wider societal and econo mic factors that shape their environment. Health needs reflect the composit ion of the population (births, ageing, and migration), changes in risk fact ors, and changes in public expectations. Hospitals gain opportunities, but also face constraints as a result of changes in the workforce on which they draw and the technology that is available to them. They must also work wit hin the constraints imposed by wider societal developments, such as the eco nomy. Hospitals must also take account of their role as centres of teaching and research, as well as their responsibilities to the local community. Hospitals across Europe have changed considerably in the 1990s, with more p eople being admitted but staying for shorter periods. With the additional d emands created by growing rates of day care and outpatients, hospitals are currently much busier places than in the past. There have also been conside rable reconfigurations of hospitals in many countries. Some have been more successful in implementing change than others. Successful change is more li kely where a whole system approach to health care is taken. Granting manage rial autonomy to individual hospitals makes change less likely. Planning ap proaches are more successful than market-based ones. Change often requires construction of new facilities. The increasingly rapi d pace of change in health care means that hospitals will have to adapt muc h more quickly than in the past. This will require a long-term programme of sustained and stable investment.