Comparison of phenotypic and marker-assisted selection for quantitative traits in sweet corn

Citation
Gg. Yousef et Ja. Juvik, Comparison of phenotypic and marker-assisted selection for quantitative traits in sweet corn, CROP SCI, 41(3), 2001, pp. 645-655
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
CROP SCIENCE
ISSN journal
0011183X → ACNP
Volume
41
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
645 - 655
Database
ISI
SICI code
0011-183X(200105/06)41:3<645:COPAMS>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
This investigation was designed to empirically compare the efficiency of ma rker-assisted selection (MAS) and phenotypic selection (PS) in enhancing ec onomically important quantitative traits in sweet corn (Zea mays L.). Marke r-assisted selection and PS were applied to three F-2:3 base populations (C O) with either the sugary1 (su1), sugary enhancer1 (se1), or shrunken2 (sh2 ) endosperm mutations. One cycle of selection was applied for both single a nd multiple traits including seedling emergence, kernel sucrose concentrati on, kernel tenderness, and hedonic rating (taste panel preference). Twenty percent of the families in each of the base populations were selected and i ntermated to constitute MAS- and PS-based C-1 composite populations. Select ion efficiencies were evaluated on the basis of gains over one cycle and es timated evaluation costs. A total of 52 paired comparisons were made betwee n MAS and PS composite populations. In 38% of the paired comparisons, MAS r esulted in significantly higher gain than PS across the three C-1 composite populations, while PS was significantly greater in only 4% of the cases. T he average MAS and PS gain across all composite populations and selected tr aits, calculated as percent increase or decrease from the randomly selected controls, was 10.9% and 6.1%, respectively. Use of MAS is most appropriate when traits are difficult and costly to measure. However, for some traits, the higher gain from MAS can compensate for the higher costs of MAS. It wa s concluded that incorporating DNA markers to traditional breeding programs could expedite selection progress and be cost-effective.