Use of reperfusion therapies in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction

Citation
Bg. Angeja et al., Use of reperfusion therapies in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction, DRUG AGING, 18(8), 2001, pp. 587-596
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
DRUGS & AGING
ISSN journal
1170229X → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
587 - 596
Database
ISI
SICI code
1170-229X(2001)18:8<587:UORTIE>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Almost one-third of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are age d > 75 years, and this proportion is expected to increase as the population ages. Mortality and complication rates are particularly high in the elderl y, yet reperfusion therapies, including thrombolysis and primary percutaneo us transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), are under-utilised among eligi ble patients. There is a concern, whether real or perceived, that the risks of such therapies may outweigh the potential benefits. Presently, there are no randomised clinical trials of thrombolytic therapy in the elderly that definitively assess its efficacy in patients aged > 75 years. In the meta-analysis of randomised trials by the Fibrinolytic Therap y Trialists, thrombolysis was associated with a mortality reduction among p atients aged > 75 years, though this reduction did not meet formal statisti cal significance. Because the point estimates for mortality reduction were in the direction that favoured use of thrombolytic therapy, the American He art Association/American College of Cardiology AMI guidelines recommend thr ombolysis as a Class 2a therapy in this age group. Observational studies us ing data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project database and the Natio nal Registry of Myocardial Infarction have recently cast some doubt on the benefit of thrombolysis among the elderly, but definitive answers from a ra ndomised trial are still lacking. Meanwhile, primary PTCA, which has been c ompared to thrombolysis in both trial and observational settings, appears t o offer the mortality benefit of reperfusion with lower stroke rates. Since primary PTCA is not widely available, efforts must be made to maximis e available therapies in the elderly. Early diagnosis is essential, as is p rompt reperfusion among eligible patients, since delay is so strongly assoc iated with mortality with both thrombolysis and PTCA. Finally, newer, more fibrin-specific thrombolytics may decrease the bleeding risk associated wit h thrombolytic therapy.