Almost one-third of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are age
d > 75 years, and this proportion is expected to increase as the population
ages. Mortality and complication rates are particularly high in the elderl
y, yet reperfusion therapies, including thrombolysis and primary percutaneo
us transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), are under-utilised among eligi
ble patients. There is a concern, whether real or perceived, that the risks
of such therapies may outweigh the potential benefits.
Presently, there are no randomised clinical trials of thrombolytic therapy
in the elderly that definitively assess its efficacy in patients aged > 75
years. In the meta-analysis of randomised trials by the Fibrinolytic Therap
y Trialists, thrombolysis was associated with a mortality reduction among p
atients aged > 75 years, though this reduction did not meet formal statisti
cal significance. Because the point estimates for mortality reduction were
in the direction that favoured use of thrombolytic therapy, the American He
art Association/American College of Cardiology AMI guidelines recommend thr
ombolysis as a Class 2a therapy in this age group. Observational studies us
ing data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project database and the Natio
nal Registry of Myocardial Infarction have recently cast some doubt on the
benefit of thrombolysis among the elderly, but definitive answers from a ra
ndomised trial are still lacking. Meanwhile, primary PTCA, which has been c
ompared to thrombolysis in both trial and observational settings, appears t
o offer the mortality benefit of reperfusion with lower stroke rates.
Since primary PTCA is not widely available, efforts must be made to maximis
e available therapies in the elderly. Early diagnosis is essential, as is p
rompt reperfusion among eligible patients, since delay is so strongly assoc
iated with mortality with both thrombolysis and PTCA. Finally, newer, more
fibrin-specific thrombolytics may decrease the bleeding risk associated wit
h thrombolytic therapy.