Analysis of glucocorticoid and androgen receptor gene fusions delineates domains required for transcriptional specificity

Citation
Dc. Whitacre et al., Analysis of glucocorticoid and androgen receptor gene fusions delineates domains required for transcriptional specificity, ENDOCRINE, 15(1), 2001, pp. 111-118
Citations number
63
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
ENDOCRINE
ISSN journal
1355008X → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
111 - 118
Database
ISI
SICI code
1355-008X(200106)15:1<111:AOGAAR>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Androgen receptor (AR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) influence distinct physiologic responses in steroid-responsive cells despite their shared abil ity to selectively bind in vitro to the same canonical DNA sequence (TGTTCT ). While the DNA-binding domains (DBDs) of these receptors are highly conse rved, the amino N-terminal domain (NTD) and hormone-binding domain (HBD) ar e evolutionarily divergent. To determine the relative contribution of these functional domains to steroid-specific effects in vivo, we constructed a p anel of AR/GR gene fusions by interchanging the NTD, DBD, and HRD regions o f each receptor and measured transcriptional regulatory activities in trans fected kidney and prostate cell lines. We found that GR was approximately 1 0-fold more active than AR when tested with the mouse mammary tumor virus p romoter, and that this difference in activity was primarily owing to sequen ce divergence in the NTDs. We also tested transcriptional activation of the androgen-dependent rat probasin promoter, and in this case, AR was at leas t twofold more active than GR. Analysis of the chimeric receptors revealed that this difference mapped to the DBD region of the two receptors. Transcr iptional repression functions of the wild-type and chimeric receptors were measured using an activator protein 1 (AP-1) transrepression assay and iden tified the GR HBD as a more potent transrepressor of AP-1 transcriptional a ctivation than the AR HBD. Taken together, our analyses reveal that evoluti onary sequence divergence between AR and GR functional domains results in u nique promoter-specific activities within biologic systems in which both AR and GR are normally expressed.