Quantitative analysis of red color sign in the endoscopic evaluation of esophageal varices

Citation
S. Ichikawa et al., Quantitative analysis of red color sign in the endoscopic evaluation of esophageal varices, ENDOSCOPY, 33(9), 2001, pp. 747-753
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ENDOSCOPY
ISSN journal
0013726X → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
747 - 753
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-726X(200109)33:9<747:QAORCS>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Background and Study Aims: Bleeding due to esophageal variceal rupture is a ssociated with an extremely high mortality rate. Variceal bleeding is frequ ent in patients who have a red color sign on endoscopy. However, the red co lor sign is subjectively evaluated on the basis of color tone and the shape of the varices. To allow standardization and facilitate consensus, an obje ctive method of assessing the red color sign is needed. In this study, a sy stem was established for quantifying the red color sign during endoscopic e valuation. Patients and Methods: Between July 1995 and February 1997, 55 untreated pat ients with portal hypertension and esophageal varices identified on upper g astrointestinal endoscopy were enrolled in the study. Images obtained about 5 cm oral to the esophagogastric junction during endoscopy were stored on magnetic optical disks using an endoscopic image processor. The still image s were transmitted to a computer and analyzed using computer software. The RGB components (R, red; G, green; B, blue) were measured at points showing flare consistent with the red color sign. The endoscopic assessment was bas ed on the Japanese Research Society for Portal Hypertension's general rules for recording endoscopic findings in esophagogastric varices. Results: The ratio of the red color area to the variceal area increased wit h increasing red color grade. There were significant positive correlations between the R and G, and G and B components. This suggests that comparing t he R components alone would allow assessment of the color differences in th e red color area and in the varices. The R value was significantly higher i n the red color area (115+/-20) than in the varices (57 +/- 19). An R value of 90 was found at the boundary between the two parts (P<0.001). Conclusions: The red color area can be automatically calculated and quantif ied using the analysis program. Improvements in data storage methods may al low realtime evaluation during endoscopy in the future.