The controversial issue of 'meritocracy' can be most productively addressed
if it is treated as one of direction of change over time: i.e. whether ind
ividual merit, understood in terms of ability, effort, or educational attai
nment, is growing in importance in processes of social selection. To test t
he thesis of 'increasing merit selection, we analyse data from two British
cohort studies relating to children born in 1958 and 1970 respectively. We
find that, from the later to the earlier cohort, the pattern of relative ra
tes of class mobility changed little; and that individual merit, as we are
able to measure it, did not play a greater part in mediating the associatio
n between class origins and destinations. In fact, the effects of ability a
nd educational attainment on individuals' relative mobility chances diminis
hed somewhat. These findings, we argue, are less surprising than they may a
t first appear if viewed in the context of the problematic relationship bet
ween the idea of meritocracy and the operation of a free-market economy.