After a long stint in consulting, Jane Epstein has just become a manager at
TechniCo. She's trying to get a fix on the various personalities and roles
of her new coworkers, and by and large, she seems to have inherited a pret
ty good team. One's got a lot of social capital built up; another seems to
be a natural salesperson. Something about Andy Zimmerman, though, has her w
orried.
At first she can't put her finger on it maybe he's a bit too aggressive? Bu
t as time passes, she watches Andy's mean streak show itself again and agai
n: He belittles administrative assistants for minor mistakes, ruthlessly cu
ts down colleagues when they present ideas that aren't fully developed, and
makes everyone in the group feel small and stupid. But Andy has another si
de: He's usually right, and he's very, very good at his job. As another man
ager tells Jane, "The guy won't win any personality contests, but you'll lo
ve his numbers." In fact, in terms of pure performance, he's the best Jane'
s got She'd be crazy not to want him in her group.
And yet, she can't deny that Andy's behavior is undermining morale and hurt
ing the team's financial performance. Now Jane's feeling frustrated. When s
he left her consulting job for this position, she expected to focus on numb
ers, products, customers-on building something. Instead, she finds that peo
ple issues are taking up most of her time.
This fictional case study explores the dynamics that occur when a star perf
ormer has a highly abrasive personality. Four commentators advise Jane on h
ow she can curb Andy's bad behavior without hurting the team's bottom line.