Au and colleagues' arguments against the hypothesis that humpback whale son
gs function as long-range sonar are based on questionable assumptions rathe
r than on empirical data. Like other echolocating mammals (e.g., bats), sin
ging humpback whales: 1) localize targets in the absence of visual informat
ion; 2) possess a highly innervated peripheral auditory system; and 3) modu
late the temporal and spectral features of their sounds based on environmen
tal conditions. The sonar equation is inadequate for determining whether hu
mpback whale songs generate detectable echoes from other whales because it
does not account for temporal variables that can strongly affect the detect
ability of echoes. In particular, the sonar equation ignores the fact that
much of the noise encountered by singing humpback whales is spectrally and
temporally predictable, and that audition in mammals is a dynamic and plast
ic process. Experiments are needed to test the hypothesis that singing hump
back whales listen for and respond to echoes generated by their songs.