S. Mutic et al., Multimodality image registration quality assurance for conformal three-dimensional treatment planning, INT J RAD O, 51(1), 2001, pp. 255-260
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: We present a quality assurance methodology to determine the accura
cy of multimodality image registration and fusion for the purpose of confor
mal three-dimensional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment p
lanning. Registration and fusion accuracy between any combination of comput
ed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR), and positron emission computed
tomography (PET) imaging studies can be evaluated.
Methods and Materials: A commercial anthropomorphic head phantom filled wit
h water and containing CT, MR, and PET visible targets was modified to eval
uate the accuracy of multimodality image registration and fusion software.
For MR and PET imaging, the water inside the phantom was doped with CuNO3 a
nd F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG), respectively. Targets consisting of
plastic spheres and pins were distributed throughout the cranium section of
the phantom. Each target sphere had a conical-shaped bore with its apex at
the center of the sphere. The pins had a conical extension or indentation
at the free end. The contours of the spheres, sphere centers, and pin tips
were used as anatomic landmark models for image registration, which was per
formed using affine coordinate-transformation tools provided in a commercia
l multimodality image registration/fusion software package. Four sets of ph
antom image studies were obtained: primary CT, secondary CT with different
phantom immobilization, MR, and PET study. A novel CT, MR, and PET external
fiducial marking system was also tested.
Results: The registration of CT/CT, CT/MR, and CT/PET images allowed correl
ation of anatomic landmarks to within 2 mm, verifying the accuracy of the r
egistration software and spatial fidelity of the four multimodality image s
ets.
Conclusions: This straightforward phantom-based quality assurance of the im
age registration and fusion process can be-used in a routine clinical setti
ng or for providing a working image set for development of the image regist
ration and fusion process and new software. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.