Comparative evaluation of oral levofloxacin and parenteral nafcillin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits
Me. Shirtliff et al., Comparative evaluation of oral levofloxacin and parenteral nafcillin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits, J ANTIMICRO, 48(2), 2001, pp. 253-258
Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is the most common pat
hogen recovered from osteomyelitis patients. The current standard therapeut
ic method for acute phase osteomyelitis is parenteral antibiotic therapy. H
owever, parenteral administration has negative aspects, such as secondary i
nfection, patient inconvenience and high cost. The use of single oral antib
iotic therapy may alleviate these problems. Therefore, the purpose of this
study was to compare the effectiveness of standard once per day dosing of o
ral levofloxacin with a standard parenteral antibiotic regimen (nafcillin f
our times daily) for the treatment of experimental MSSA osteomyelitis in ra
bbits. Nearly all tibias from untreated infected controls (n = 27) revealed
positive cultures (93%) for S. aureus, while the levofloxacin-treated grou
p (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages of S. aureus infect
ion (50%). The infected tibias of the nafcillin-treated group (n = 20) demo
nstrated significantly lower percentages (10%) of infected tibias than eith
er the controls or the levofloxacin-treated groups (P < 0.05). The inferior
efficacy of levofloxacin may have been due to the pharmacokinetic profile
of this fluoroquinolone. The serum kinetics demonstrated that following sin
gle dose administration, levofloxacin was almost undetectable after 12 h. S
tudies in which levofloxacin is dosed every 12 h or given at increased dose
s in order to obtain bactericidal concentrations throughout the treatment r
egimen are needed.