Ph. Peters et al., Long-term use of oseltamivir for the prophylaxis of influenza in a vaccinated frail older population, J AM GER SO, 49(8), 2001, pp. 1025-1031
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","General & Internal Medicine
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of once-daily oral oseltamivir for
6 weeks (Tamiflu (TM)) in prophylaxis against laboratory-confirmed clinical
influenza in frail older subjects living in homes for seniors and to deter
mine the safety and tolerability of long-term oseltamivir.
DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized, multi
center study.
SETTING: Thirty-one residential homes for seniors across United States and
Europe.
PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred forty-eight frail older occupants (mean age 81 y
ears, > 80% vaccinated).
INTERVENTION: Prophylaxis with oseltamivir 75 mg or placebo once daily for
6 weeks, beginning when influenza was detected locally.
MEASUREMENTS: The primary efficacy endpoint was laboratory-confirmed clinic
al influenza.
RESULTS: Oseltamivir administration resulted in a 92% reduction in the inci
dence of laboratory-confirmed clinical influenza compared with placebo (pla
cebo 12/272 (4.4%), oseltamivir 1/276 (0.4%); P = .002). Of subjects vaccin
ated against influenza, oseltamivir was 91 % effective in preventing labora
tory-confirmed clinical influenza (placebo 11/218 (5.0%), oseltamivir 1/222
(0.5%); P = .003). Oseltamivir use was associated with a significant reduc
tion in the incidence of secondary complications (placebo 7/272 (2.6 %), os
eltamivir 1/276 (0.4%); P = .037). Although nearly all subjects were taking
concomitant medication both before and during the study, oseltamivir was w
ell tolerated. A similar incidence of adverse events, including gastrointes
tinal effects, occurred in both groups. There was no suppression of antibod
y response in oseltamivir recipients.
CONCLUSION: Oral oseltamivir 75 mg once daily for 6 weeks effectively preve
nted clinical influenza in vaccinated frail older subjects using significan
t concomitant medications in a residential care setting. The treatment was
well tolerated and provided additional protection to that afforded by vacci
nation.