A pilot study of time allocation and reimbursement for routine obstetric ultrasonography

Citation
Ks. Stewart et al., A pilot study of time allocation and reimbursement for routine obstetric ultrasonography, J ULTR MED, 20(9), 2001, pp. 973-978
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE
ISSN journal
02784297 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
973 - 978
Database
ISI
SICI code
0278-4297(200109)20:9<973:APSOTA>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate time allocation during initial and repeated ultrason ography and to formulate recommendations to improve unit efficiency. Method s. Over a 2-year period, 51 comprehensive ultrasonographic examinations bet ween 14 and 38 weeks' gestational age were observed by a single reviewer. E ach patient-sonographer interaction was divided into timed segments, includ ing setup, examination time, review, and turnover. Statistical analysis usi ng descriptive statistics, Student t test, and analysis of variance was per formed to determine the effect of the number of ultrasonographic examinatio ns, sonographer experience, estimated gestational age, and patient body mas s index on examination time. Results The average time spent with each patie nt was 15 minutes 22 seconds: 2 minutes 10 seconds for setup, 9 minutes 38 seconds for examination, 1 minute 50 seconds for review, and 1 minute 44 se conds for turnover. Examination length was not significantly affected by es timated gestational age, body mass index, ultrasonography experience, or th e number of ultrasonographic examinations (P > .05). No statistical signifi cance In the duration of scanning was found between initial (15 minutes 3 s econds) and repeated (16 minutes 1 second) examinations (P = .609). Nonexam ination activities, such as data entry and room cleanup, consumed 37% of th e sonographer's time. Conclusions. Resource use within the ultrasonography department may be improved by reassigning clerical and custodial duties fro m sonographers to other personnel. Although differential reimbursement exis ts, no statistically significant difference in resource use between initial and repeated examinations was found.