Objective. To investigate the difference in the nodal hilus. evaluated by g
ray scale and power Doppler sonography. Methods. One hundred ninety-two pat
ients with proven cervical lymphadenopathy were included in the study (meta
stases, n = 118; tuberculosis, n = 56; and lymphoma, n = 18). Lymph nodes w
ere evaluated by gray scale sonography for the echogenic hilus and power Do
ppler sonography for hilar vascularity. Results. Mar vascularity was found
even though the lymph node did not show an echogenic hilus on gray scale so
nography (metastases, 59%; tuberculosis, 66%; and lymphoma, 91%). Conclusio
ns. Sonologists should be aware that gray scale and Doppler sonography show
different aspects of the hilus, and the absence of the hilus on gray scale
sonography does not necessarily imply an associated absence of hilar vascu
larity.