Educational differences in the prevalence of mobility disability in old age: The dynamics of incidence, mortality, and recovery

Citation
D. Melzer et al., Educational differences in the prevalence of mobility disability in old age: The dynamics of incidence, mortality, and recovery, J GERONT B, 56(5), 2001, pp. S294-S301
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
ISSN journal
10795014 → ACNP
Volume
56
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
S294 - S301
Database
ISI
SICI code
1079-5014(200109)56:5<S294:EDITPO>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Objectives. Older people with less education have substantially higher prev alence rates of mobility disability, This study aimed to establish the rela tive contributions of incidence, recovery rates, and death to prevalence di fferences in mobility disability associated with educational status. Methods. Data were from 3 sites of the Established Populations for Epidemio logical Study of the Elderly, covering 8,871 people aged 65-84 years who we re followed for up to 7 years. Participants were classified on years of edu cation received and as disabled if they needed help or were unable to walk up or down stairs or walk half a mile. A Markov model computed relative ris ks, adjusting for the effects of repeated observations on the same individu als. Results. Differences between education groups in person-years lived with di sability were large. The relative risk of incident disability in men with 0 -7 years of education (vs. those with 12 or more years) was 1.65 (95% CI = 1.37-1.97) and in women was 1.70 (95% CI = 1.15-2.53). Both recovery risks and risks of death in those with disability were not significantly differen t across education groups in either gender. Discussion. Higher incidence of disability is the main contributor to the s ubstantially higher prevalence of disability in older people of lower socio economic status. Efforts to reduce the disparity in disability rates by soc ioeconomic status in old age should focus mainly on preventing disability, because differences in the course of mobility disability after onset appear to play a limited role in the observed prevalence disparities.