Travel cost models are routinely used to assess the impact of policy change
s on consumer's surplus. In this paper we show that when the policy change
leads to a partial closure of the resource, then the standard use of consum
er's surplus per trip can be inappropriate depending upon the theoretical b
ehavioral model underlying the analysis. We demonstrate the importance of t
heoretical model choice using an analysis of the Gulf of Mexico's recreatio
nal red snapper fishery.