Many attempts have been made over the years with varying degrees of success
to developing metallic alternatives to dental amalgam. Much of the difficu
lty join achieving success is the inability to meet the physical, mechanica
l and clinical criteria for an "ideal" alternative. An additional requireme
nt for any new material is that it be "environmentally friendly"-both from
a manufacturing standpoint and in use. Gold foil has been one of dentistry'
s most successful direct filling materials, but is only used by few/select
clinicians and is largely considered a lost art. Metal-modified glass ionom
ers have achieved some success as crown buildup materials and direct restor
atives in the primary teeth of children, but these are slowly being displac
ed by improved composites. Several attempts have been made to develop metal
-filled composites, but only one product is available for use as a crown bu
ildup material. There is a long history of attempts to formulate an accepta
ble gallium alloy. Early nickel-gallium formulations resulted in severe tum
orgenicity in animal trials. Palladium-gallium-tin alloys were less toxic b
ut still exhibited high latent expansion and severe soft tissue inflammatio
n around implants and tissue-embedded particles. More recent attempts to fo
rmulate silver-copper-gallium-indium-tin alloys resulted in better biocompa
tibility, but clinical trials showed corrosion and latent expansion too sev
ere for general clinical acceptability. Studies of consolidated silver mate
rials have resulted in the development of a direct restorative system with
favorable properties and biocompatibility, but no human trials have yet eva
luated the material's clinical performance. The demands in today's market f
or esthetics and regulatory pressures to reduce heavy metals in wastewater
have resulted in less interest in metallic alternatives for amalgam. Future
development will likely focus on improving polymeric composites in an atte
mpt to meet the call for an amalgam alternative.