A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of orbital radiotherapy for Graves' ophthalmopathy

Citation
Ca. Gorman et al., A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of orbital radiotherapy for Graves' ophthalmopathy, OPHTHALMOL, 108(9), 2001, pp. 1523-1534
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology,"da verificare
Journal title
OPHTHALMOLOGY
ISSN journal
01616420 → ACNP
Volume
108
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1523 - 1534
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-6420(200109)108:9<1523:APRDPS>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Context Although widely used for more than 85 years, the efficacy of radiot herapy for Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) has not been established convincingl y. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy for GO. Design: Prospective, randomized, internally controlled, double-blind clinic al trial in a tertiary care academic medical center. Participants: The patients were ethnically diverse males and females over a ge 30 seen in a referral practice. The patients had moderate, symptomatic G raves' ophthalmopathy (mean clinical activity score, 6.2) but no optic neur opathy, diabetes, recent steroid treatment, previous decompression, or musc le surgery. Forty-two of 53 consecutive patients were enrolled after giving informed consent and fulfilling study entry criteria. Eleven eligible pati ents declined to participate because of inconvenience, desire for alternati ve therapy, or concern about radiation. Intervention: One randomly selected orbit was treated with 20 Gy of externa l beam therapy; sham therapy was given to the other side. Six months later, the therapies were reversed. Main Outcome Measures: Every 3 months for 1 year, we measured the volume of extraocular muscle and fat, proptosis, range of extraocular muscle motion, area of diplopia fields, and lid fissure width. Effective treatment for GO will modify one or more of these parameters. Results: No clinically or statistically significant difference between the treated and untreated orbit was observed in any of the main outcome measure s at 6 months. At 12 months, muscle volume and proptosis improved slightly more in the orbit that was treated first. Conclusions: In this group of patients, representative of those for whom ra diotherapy is frequently recommended, we were unable to demonstrate any ben eficial therapeutic effect. The slight improvement noted in both orbits at 12 months may be the result of natural remission or of radiotherapy, but th e changes are of marginal clinical significance. (C) 2001 by the American A cademy of Ophthalmology.