A comparison of two methods of evaluating cornea-to-contact lens base curve fluorescein patterns in keratoconus

Citation
Ba. Fink et al., A comparison of two methods of evaluating cornea-to-contact lens base curve fluorescein patterns in keratoconus, OPT VIS SCI, 78(8), 2001, pp. 589-598
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology
Journal title
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE
ISSN journal
10405488 → ACNP
Volume
78
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
589 - 598
Database
ISI
SICI code
1040-5488(200108)78:8<589:ACOTMO>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Purpose. The purposes of the study were as follows: (1) to compare the apic al fitting relationship of habitual contact lens fluorescein patterns in ke ratoconus as determined by clinician assessment of on-eye patterns to those determined by photograph readers looking at slides of fluorescein patterns and (2) to determine the validity of the techniques used in assessing the apical fitting relationships of rigid corneal contact lenses on keratoconic corneas. Methods. Central fluorescein patterns of rigid contact lens-weari ng keratoconus patients enrolled in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluati on of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study were graded as "definite touch," "touch," "c learance," or "definite clearance" by certified clinicians. Photographs of these patterns were evaluated independently by certified, masked photograph readers using the same grading scale. Results. Agreement between "re-reads " of the same fluorescein pattern slides by the photograph readers was subs tantial (weighted kappa = 0.751). Agreement between assessments of habitual fit fluorescein patterns at the baseline vs. the repeat visits was poor fo r the photograph readers (weighted kappa = 0.254) and moderate for the clin icians (kappa = 0.480). Agreement between clinicians' and photograph reader s' assessment of the habitual contact lens fluorescein pattern at the basel ine visit was fair (weighted kappa = 0.382). Conclusions. Repeatability and validity of this technique were fair to excellent. Many factors influence fluorescein pattern interpretation, and improvement of the objective method of fluorescein pattern assessment by photograph readers will require impro ved methodology that takes these factors into consideration.