Little is known about the ability of small-volume valved spacer devices to
deliver a significant amount of an aerosolized drug to the lungs of babies.
This study compared the in vitro delivery of salbutamol administered via A
erochamber-Infant (145 mL), Babyhaler (350 mL), and metallic NES-spacer (25
0 mL), as well as the in vivo delivery using an animal model. The lung depo
sition study of technetium-99m-labeled salbutamol was conducted in six anes
thetized, intubated (3.0-mm endotracheal tube simulating oropharyngeal depo
sition), spontaneously breathing New Zealand White rabbits, a model for 3-k
g babies. Each rabbit was studied on three separate occasions, once with ea
ch spacer device. The amount of radioactivity deposited in the spacer devic
e, the endotracheal tube, the lungs, or the body was measured by a gamma ca
mera and expressed as a percentage of the emitted labeled dose. The emitted
dose and particle size distribution of salbutamol,ia the three spacer devi
ces were measured using unit dose sampling tubes and an eight-stage Anderso
n cascade impactor, respectively. The results were compared by ANOVA or Stu
dent-Newman-Keuls Lest when indicated. In vitro, the NES-spacer and Babyhal
er were equivalent for delivering particles < 5.8 mum in diameter (NES-spac
er = Babyhaler > Aerochamber-Infant; p < 0.05). In vivo, the lung and body
deposition was low with all spacer devices (range: 0.52-5.40% of the delive
red dose) but greater with the NES-spacer than with the Aerochamber-Infant
or the Babyhaler (5.40 +/- 2.40%, 2.91 +/- 0.86%, 0.52 +/- 0.46%, respectiv
ely p = 0.002). These results suggest the metal-valved spacer device may be
preferable for delivering pressurized aerosols to spontaneously breathing
infants.