Eye fixations were recorded to assess whether, how, and when readers draw i
nferences about predictable events. Predicting context sentences, or non-pr
edicting control sentences, were presented, followed by continuation senten
ces in which a target word referred to a predictable event (inferential wor
d) or an unlikely event (non-predictable word). There were no effects on in
itial target word processing measures, such as launch and landing sites, fi
xation probability, first-fixation duration, or first-pass reading time. Ho
wever, relative to the control condition, the predicting context (1) speede
d up reanalysis of the inferential word as revealed by a reduction in secon
d-pass reading time and regressions, and (2) interfered with processing of
the non-predictable word, as shown by an increase in regressions. These res
ults indicate that predictive inferences are active at late text integratio
n processes, rather than at early lexical-access processes. The pattern of
findings suggests that these inferences involve initial activation of rathe
r general concepts following the inducing context, and that they are comple
ted or refined with delay, after the inferential target word is read.