The impact of changes in HCFA documentation requirements on academic emergency medicine: Results of a physician survey

Citation
Sa. Mclean et Ja. Feldman, The impact of changes in HCFA documentation requirements on academic emergency medicine: Results of a physician survey, ACAD EM MED, 8(9), 2001, pp. 880-885
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10696563 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
880 - 885
Database
ISI
SICI code
1069-6563(200109)8:9<880:TIOCIH>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Background: The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) has dramaticall y increased documentation and procedural supervision required by faculty in academic emergency departments (EDs). Objectives: To determine academic em ergency medicine (EM) physicians' perceptions of the impact of HCFA documen tation requirements (HDR) on teaching time, clinical efficiency, and job sa tisfaction. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was done using a survey of New England academic EM faculty from September to December 1999 . E-mail surveys were followed by hard copy to nonresponders. Teaching time , clinical efficiency, and job satisfaction were rated on a five-point Like rt scale. Yes/no questions about other possible benefits of HCFA regulation s were asked. Frequency (95% CI) and chi-square analyses were performed. Re sults: One hundred seventy-four of 233 (75%) responded. Eighty-nine percent (95% CI = 84% to 93%) of, the respondents thought teaching time was somewh at or markedly decreased by changes in HDR (somewhat 46%, markedly 43%). Se venty-nine percent (95% CI = 73% to 85%) believed clinical efficiency was s omewhat or markedly decreased by changes in HDR (somewhat 49%, markedly 30% ). Eighty percent (95% CI = 73% to 86%) reported somewhat or markedly decre ased job satisfaction due to changes in HDR (somewhat 56%, markedly 24%). T wenty-one percent (95% CI = 15% to 27%) believed changes in HDR had improve d patient care by requiring increased patient supervision. Forty-eight perc ent (95% CI = 40% to 56%) thought that changes in documentation requirement s had decreased medicolegal risk by improving patient documentation. Conclu sions: Most academic EM physicians in New England perceive that HDR have de creased clinical efficiency, teaching time, and job satisfaction, These fin dings suggest that changes in HDR may have a substantial impact on many dif ferent aspects of emergency care provided in academic settings.