ESOPHAGEAL REPLACEMENT WITH COLON IN CHILDREN USING EITHER THE INTRATHORACIC OR RETROSTERNAL ROUTE - AN ANALYSIS OF BOTH SURGICAL AND LONG-TERM RESULTS
E. Pompeo et al., ESOPHAGEAL REPLACEMENT WITH COLON IN CHILDREN USING EITHER THE INTRATHORACIC OR RETROSTERNAL ROUTE - AN ANALYSIS OF BOTH SURGICAL AND LONG-TERM RESULTS, SURGERY TODAY-THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 27(8), 1997, pp. 729-734
A total of 28 colon esophageal replacements performed in children for
long gap esophageal atresia (22 patients), and intractable caustic str
icture (6 patients) were reviewed, Emphasis was placed on identifying
the pros and cons of the different reconstruction techniques: intratho
racic route (ITR) (19 patients) and retrosternal route (RSR) (9 patien
ts), No hospital mortality occurred, whereas a higher morbidity rate o
ccurred among patients operated on using the ITR as opposed to the RSR
(68% vs 55%; P not significant). Six patients developed an anastomoti
c fistula (21% with the ITR vs 22% with the RSR; P not significant), w
hereas an anastomotic stenosis occurred in 13 patients (67% with the R
SR, and 37% with the ITR; P < 0.07), Overall, dysphagia was the most p
revalent symptom at 3 months follow-up, but had significantly decrease
d at the final follow-up (54% vs 16%; P < 0.0027), Functional results
improved significantly during the follow-up (score 1-2 vs score 3-4; F
isher test: P = 0.001), However, despite the higher morbidity rate, be
tter functional results were achieved using the ITR as opposed to the
RSR.