Increasing incidence of midterm and long-term complications after endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A note of caution based ona 9-year experience
T. Ohki et al., Increasing incidence of midterm and long-term complications after endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A note of caution based ona 9-year experience, ANN SURG, 234(3), 2001, pp. 323-334
Objective To analyze the late complications after endovascular graft repair
of elective abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) at the authors' institution
since November 1992.
Summary Background Data Recently, the use of endovascular grafts for the tr
eatment of AAAs has increased dramatically. However, there is little midter
m or long-term proof of their efficacy.
Methods During the past 9 years, 239 endovascular graft repairs were perfor
med for nonruptured AAAs, many (86%) in high-risk patients or in those with
complex anatomy. The grafts used were Montefiore (n = 97), Ancure/EVT (n =
14), Vanguard (n = 16), Talent (n = 47), Excluder (n = 20), AneuRx (n = 29
), and Zenith (n = 16). All but the AneuRx and Ancure repairs were performe
d as part of a U.S. phase 1 or phase 2 clinical trial under a Food and Drug
Administration investigational device exemption. Procedural outcomes and f
ollow-up results were prospectively recorded.
Results The major complication and death rates within 30 days of endovascul
ar graft repair were 17.6% and 8.5%, respectively. The technical success ra
te with complete AAA exclusion was 88.7%. During follow-up to 75 months (me
an +/- standard deviation, 15.7 +/- 6.3 months), 53 patients (22%) died of
unrelated causes. Two AAAs treated with endovascular grafts ruptured and we
re surgically repaired, with one death. Other late complications included t
ype 1 endoleak (n = 7), aortoduodenal fistula (n = 2), graft thrombosis/ste
nosis (n = 7), limb separation or fabric tear with a subsequent type 3 endo
leak (n = 1), and a persistent type 2 endoleak (n = 13). Secondary interven
tion or surgery was required in 23 patients (10%). These included deploymen
t of a second graft (n = 4), open AAA repair (n = 5), coil embolization (n
= 6), extraanatomic bypass (n = 4), and stent placement (n = 3).
Conclusion With longer follow-up, complications occurred with increasing fr
equency. Although most could be managed with some form of endovascular rein
tervention, some complications resulted in a high death rate. Although endo
vascular graft repair is less invasive and sometimes effective in the long
term, it is often not a definitive procedure. These findings mandate long-t
erm surveillance and prospective studies to prove the effectiveness of endo
vascular graft repair.