Clinical intestinal transplantation: A decade of experience at a single center
Authors
Abu-Elmagd, K
Reyes, J
Bond, G
Mazariegos, G
Wu, T
Murase, N
Sindhi, R
Martin, D
Colangelo, J
Zak, M
Janson, D
Ezzelarab, M
Dvorchik, I
Parizhskaya, M
Deutsch, M
Demetris, A
Fung, J
Starzl, TE
Citation
K. Abu-elmagd et al., Clinical intestinal transplantation: A decade of experience at a single center, ANN SURG, 234(3), 2001, pp. 404-416
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANNALS OF SURGERY
SICI code
0003-4932(200109)234:3<404:CITADO>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Objective To assess the long-term efficacy of intestinal transplantation un
der tacrolimus-based immunosuppression and the therapeutic benefit of newly
developed adjunct immunosuppressants and management strategies.
Summary Background Data With the advent of tacrolimus in 1990, transplantat
ion of the intestine began to emerge as therapy for intestinal failure. How
ever, a high risk of rejection, with the consequent need for acute and chro
nic high-dose immunosuppression, has inhibited its widespread application.
Methods During an 11-year period, divided into two segments by a 1-year mor
atorium in 1994, 155 patients received 165 intestinal allografts under immu
nosuppression based on tacrolimus and prednisone: 65 intestine alone, 75 li
ver and intestine, and 25 multivisceral. For the transplantations since the
moratorium (n = 99), an adjunct immunosuppressant (cyclophosphamide or dac
lizumab) was used for 74 transplantations, adjunct donor bone marrow was gi
ven in 39, and the intestine of 11 allografts was irradiated with a single
dose of 750 cGy.
Results The actuarial survival rate for the total population was 75% at 1 y
ear, 54% at 5 years, and 42% at 10 years. Recipients of liver plus intestin
e had the best long-term prognosis and the lowest risk of graft loss from r
ejection (P = .001). Since 1994, survival rates have improved. Techniques f
or early detection of Epstein-Barr and cytomegaloviral infections, bone mar
row augmentation, the adjunct use of the interleukin-2 antagonist daclizuma
b, and most recently allograft irradiation may have contributed to the bett
er results.
Conclusion The survival rates after intestinal transplantation have cumulat
ively improved during the past decade. With the management strategies curre
ntly under evaluation, intestinal transplant procedures have the potential
to become the standard of care for patients with end-stage intestinal failu
re.