A randomised controlled trial of two methods of delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure after extubation to infants weighing less than 1000 g: binasal (Hudson) versus single nasal prongs
P. Davis et al., A randomised controlled trial of two methods of delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure after extubation to infants weighing less than 1000 g: binasal (Hudson) versus single nasal prongs, ARCH DIS CH, 85(2), 2001, pp. F82-F85
Objectives-Primary: to determine whether nasal continuous positive airway p
ressure (CPAP) delivered through binasal prongs results in a greater propor
tion of extremely low birthweight infants being successfully extubated, aft
er a period of intermittent positive pressure ventilation, than nasal CPAP
delivered by a single nasal prong. Secondary: to evaluate the effect of mod
e of delivery of nasal CPAP after extubation on the need for endotracheal r
eintubation, weight gain, rates of feeding intolerance, sepsis, suspected s
epsis, cranial ultrasound abnormalities, retinopathy of prematurity, chroni
c lung disease, and the duration of assisted ventilation and care in the te
rtiary neonatal unit.
Design and setting-Randomised, controlled, clinical trial conducted at the
neonatal intensive care unit of the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Aust
ralia.
Patients-Infants of birth weight less than 1000 g, ventilated, requiring <
50% oxygen and ventilator rate less than or equal to 20/minute, and conside
red by the clinical management team to be ready for extubation.
Intervention-Infants were randomly allocated to receive nasal CPAP delivere
d through binasal (Hudson) prongs or a single nasal prong. Primary outcome
measure-Failure of extubation as defined by the following criteria: (a) apn
oea (more than one episode! hour over a six hour period or one episode requ
iring bag and mask ventilation); (b) absolute increase in oxygen requiremen
t greater than 15% above that required before extubation; (c) respiratory a
cidosis (pH < 7.25 with PCO2 > 6.67 kPa).
Results-Ten of the 41 (24%) infants randomised to binasal prongs reached pr
edetermined failure criteria compared with 26 of the 46 (57%) infants rando
mised to a single nasal prong (p = 0.005). Four of 17 (24%) infants of birt
h weight less than 800 g extubated to binasal prongs reached failure criter
ia compared with 14 of 16 (88%) extubated to a single nasal prong (p < 0.00
1). There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes.
Conclusions-For extremely low birthweight infants ventilated using an endot
racheal tube, nasal CPAP delivered through binasal (Hudson) prongs is more
effective in preventing failure of extubation than that delivered through a
single nasal prong.