Energy consumption during level walking with arm and knee immobilized

Citation
E. Hanada et C. Kerrigan, Energy consumption during level walking with arm and knee immobilized, ARCH PHYS M, 82(9), 2001, pp. 1251-1254
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
00039993 → ACNP
Volume
82
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1251 - 1254
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9993(200109)82:9<1251:ECDLWW>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether there is an increase in energy use for able -bodied subjects with their arm and/or knee immobilized, while walking on a level surface at comfortable walking speed (CWS). Design: Prospective, quantitative, with randomly sequenced experimental tri als. Setting: Rehabilitation center. Participants: Ten healthy subjects, none of whom had gait abnormality. Intervention: Subjects walked on a treadmill at CWS under 4 conditions: (1) without an arm or knee immobilized (N); (2) with an arm immobilized (AI); (3) with a knee immobilized (KI); and (4) with both arm and ipsilateral kne e immobilized (KAI). Main Outcome Measures: Breath-by-breath oxygen cost; differences in energy consumption in trials during which constraints were used were compared with energy consumed under the N condition and the percentage of change was cal culated. Results: Mean oxygen cost increased by 22.7% with a knee immobilized compar ed with N values (mean difference, .044mL . kg(-1) . m(-1), p < .0001), and increased by 24.7% with a knee and arm immobilized (mean difference, .048m L . kg(-1) . m(-1), p < .0001). However, no significant differences existed in oxygen cost with Al compared with N, or with KAI compared with KI. The differences in CWS between the stages followed a similar pattern. Conclusions: Arm immobilization does not increase energy expenditure during level walking at CWS, and does not further increase energy expenditure whe n the ipsilateral knee also is immobilized.