Objective: To determine whether there is an increase in energy use for able
-bodied subjects with their arm and/or knee immobilized, while walking on a
level surface at comfortable walking speed (CWS).
Design: Prospective, quantitative, with randomly sequenced experimental tri
als.
Setting: Rehabilitation center.
Participants: Ten healthy subjects, none of whom had gait abnormality.
Intervention: Subjects walked on a treadmill at CWS under 4 conditions: (1)
without an arm or knee immobilized (N); (2) with an arm immobilized (AI);
(3) with a knee immobilized (KI); and (4) with both arm and ipsilateral kne
e immobilized (KAI).
Main Outcome Measures: Breath-by-breath oxygen cost; differences in energy
consumption in trials during which constraints were used were compared with
energy consumed under the N condition and the percentage of change was cal
culated.
Results: Mean oxygen cost increased by 22.7% with a knee immobilized compar
ed with N values (mean difference, .044mL . kg(-1) . m(-1), p < .0001), and
increased by 24.7% with a knee and arm immobilized (mean difference, .048m
L . kg(-1) . m(-1), p < .0001). However, no significant differences existed
in oxygen cost with Al compared with N, or with KAI compared with KI. The
differences in CWS between the stages followed a similar pattern.
Conclusions: Arm immobilization does not increase energy expenditure during
level walking at CWS, and does not further increase energy expenditure whe
n the ipsilateral knee also is immobilized.