Ss. Wang et al., Mechanical bridge with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and ventricularassist device to heart transplantation, ARTIF ORGAN, 25(8), 2001, pp. 599-602
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of double bridges with ext
racorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ventricular assist devices (VAD
s) in clinical heart transplantation. Between May 1994 and October 2000, 13
4 patients underwent heart transplantation at the National Taiwan Universit
y Hospital. Ten patients received ECMO or VAD support as bridges to transpl
antation. The ages ranged from 3 to 63 years. The indications included card
iac arrest under cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 2 and profound cardiogeni
c shock refractory to conventional therapy in 8 patients. Usually ECMO was
first set up as rescue therapy. If ECMO could not be weaned off after short
-term (usually 1 week) support, suitable VADs (HeartMate or Thoratec VAD) w
ere implanted for medium-term or long-term support. Five patients received
ECMO support as emergency rescue for 2 to 9 days, and then moved to Thorate
c VAD for 8, 49, and 55 days, respectively, or centrifugal VAD for 31 days,
or HeartMate VAD for 224 days. They all survived. The survival rate of dou
ble bridges with ECMO and VAD was 100%. In postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock
, circulatory collapse from acute myocardial infarction or myocarditis, ECM
O is the device of choice for short-term support. If heart transplantation
is indicated, VADs should replace ECMO for their superiority as a bridge to
heart transplantation. Our preliminary data of double bridges with ECMO an
d VAD revealed good results and were reliable and effective bridges to tran
splantation.