Kinetic competence of the cADP-ribose-CD38 complex as an intermediate in the CD38/NAD(+) glycohydrolase-catalysed reactions: implication for CD38 signalling
I. Cakir-kiefer et al., Kinetic competence of the cADP-ribose-CD38 complex as an intermediate in the CD38/NAD(+) glycohydrolase-catalysed reactions: implication for CD38 signalling, BIOCHEM J, 358, 2001, pp. 399-406
CD38/NAD(+) glycohydrolase is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein widely u
sed to study T- and B-cell activation and differentiation. CD38 is endowed
with two different activities: it is a signal transduction molecule and an
ectoenzyme that converts NAD(+) into ADP-ribose (NAD(+) glycohydrolase acti
vity) and small proportions of cADP-ribose (cADPR; ADP-ribosyl cyclase acti
vity), a calcium-mobilizing metabolite, which, ultimately, can also be hydr
olysed (cADPR hydrolase activity). The relationship between these two prope
rties, and strikingly the requirement for signalling in the formation of fr
ee or enzyme-complexed cADPR, is still ill-defined. In the present study we
wanted to test whether the CD38-cADPR complex is kinetically competent in
the conversion of NAD(+) into the reaction product ADP-ribose. In principle
, such a complex could be invoked for cross-talk, via conformational change
s, with neighbouring partner(s) of CD38 thus triggering the signalling phen
omena. Analysis of the kinetic parameters measured for the CD38/NAD(+) glyc
ohydrolase-catalysed hydrolysis of 2'-deoxy-2'-aminoribo-NAD(+) and ADP-cyc
lo[N1,C1']-2'-deoxy-2'-aminoribose (slowly hydrolysable analogues of NAD(+)
and cADPR respectively) ruled out that the CD38-cADPR complex can accumula
te under steady-state conditions. This was borne out by simulation of the p
revalent kinetic mechanism of CD38, which involve the partitioning of a com
mon E . ADP-ribosyl intermediate in the formation of the enzyme-catalysed r
eaction products. Using this mechanism, microscopic rate conditions were fo
und which transform a NAD(+) glycohydrolase into an ADP-ribosyl cyclase. Al
together, the present work shows that if the cross-talk with a partner depe
nds on a conformational change of CD38, this is most probably not attributa
ble to the formation of the CD38-cADPR complex. In line with recent results
on the conformational change triggered by CD38 ligands [Berthelier, Labour
eau, Boulla, Schuber and Deterre (2000) Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 3056-3064], w
e believe that the Michaelis CD38-NAD(+) complex could play such a role ins
tead.