The purpose of this paper is to review what we know about various biomarker
s of butadiene in animal, human and in vitro studies, and to draw inference
s from these data that impact on the accurate assessment of human risks for
cancer. Studies comparing the DNA and hemoglobin adducts of butadiene with
exposure, metabolism and genotoxicity have provided a great deal of insigh
t that is applicable to biologically based risk assessment. First, the DNA
and hemoglobin adduct data strongly support the conclusion that 3,4-epoxy-1
,2-butanediol is the major electrophile available for binding to these macr
omolecules. Biomarker studies have also provided insight into the possibili
ty of a sensitive population associated with the GSTT1 null genotype. While
it is clear that lymphocytes from GSTT1 null individuals are more sensitiv
e for the induction of sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) following in vitro
exposure to 1,2,3,4-diepoxybutane, there was no such increase in SCE or oth
er biomarkers of genotoxicity in workers exposed to 1-3 p.p.m. butadiene, r
egardless of GST genotype. The globin adduct data also demonstrate that the
re is roughly a tenfold range for interindividual differences in the metabo
lism of butadiene. This type of analysis represents an excellent means for
providing scientific data for this critical determinant. Another useful app
lication of hemoglobin adducts in risk assessment was demonstrated by regre
ssing data for various endpoints for genotoxicity against that individual's
biologically effective dose, thereby providing an independent mechanism fo
r evaluation that excludes any possible confounding by inappropriate contro
ls. Finally, biomarker studies have identified critical gaps in our knowled
ge that are needed for the accurate assessment of butadiene. Most notable o
f these is the lack of diepoxide-specific biomarkers in mice, rats and huma
ns. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.