Gully-head erosion processes on a semi-arid valley floor in Kenya: A case study into temporal variation and sediment budgeting

Citation
Djo. Wijdenes et R. Bryan, Gully-head erosion processes on a semi-arid valley floor in Kenya: A case study into temporal variation and sediment budgeting, EARTH SURF, 26(9), 2001, pp. 911-933
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS
ISSN journal
01979337 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
911 - 933
Database
ISI
SICI code
0197-9337(200108)26:9<911:GEPOAS>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
A three year monitoring programme of gully-head retreat was established to assess the significance of sediment production in a drainage network that e xpanded rapidly by gully-head erosion on the low-angled alluvio-lacustrine Njemps Flats in semi-arid Baringo District, Kenya. This paper discusses the factors controlling the large observed spatial and temporal variation in g ully-head retreat rates, ranging from 0 to 15 m a(-1). The selected gullies differed in planform and in runoff-contributing catchment area but soil ma terial and land use were similar. The data were analysed at event and annua l timescales. The results show that at annual timescale rainfall amount app ears to be a good indicator of gully-head retreat, while at storm-event tim escale rainfall distribution has to be taken into account. A model is propo sed, including only rainfall (P) and the number of dry days (DD) between st orms: Retreat = 0.22(DD x P-0.5) + 2.9 which explains 56 per cent of the variation in retreat rate of the single-h eaded gully of Lam1. A detailed sediment budget has been established for Lam1 and its runoff-con tributing area (RCA). By measuring sediment input from the RCA, the sedimen t output by channelized flow and linear retreat of the gully head for nine storms, it can be seen that erosion shifts between different components of the budget depending on the duration of the dry period (DD) between storms. Sediment input from the RCA was usually the largest component for the smal ler storms. The erosion of the gully head occurred as a direct effect of ru noff falling over the edge (GH(waterfall)) and of the indirect destabilizat ion of the adjacent walls by the waterfall erosion and by saturation (GH(ma ss/storage)). The latter component (GH(mass/storage)) was usually much larg er that the former (GH(waterfall)). The sediment output from the gully was strongly related to the runoff volume while the linear retreat, because of its complex behaviour, was not. Overall, the results show that the annual retreat is the optimal timescale to predict retreat patterns. More detailed knowledge about relevant process es and interactions is necessary if gully-head erosion is to be included in event-based soil erosion models. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd .