H. Van Loveren et al., Vaccine-induced antibody responses as parameters of the influence of endogenous and environmental factors, ENVIR H PER, 109(8), 2001, pp. 757-764
In laboratory animals, an adequate way to assess effects of environmental e
xposures on the immune system is to study effects on antigen-specific immun
e responses, such as after sensitization to T-cell-dependent antigens. This
probably also applies to testing effects in the human population. It has t
hus been suggested that antibody responses to vaccination might be useful i
n this context. Vaccination responses may be influenced by a variety of fac
tors other than environmental ones. One factor is the vaccine itself; a sec
ond is the vaccination procedure used. In addition, the intrinsic capacity
of the recipient to respond to a vaccine, which is determined by sex, genet
ic factors, and age, is important. Psychological stress, nutrition, and (in
fectious) diseases are also likely to have an impact. We reviewed the liter
ature on vaccine response. With regard to exogenous factors, there is good
evidence that smoking, diet, psychological stress, and certain infectious d
iseases affect vaccination titers, although it is difficult to determine to
what extent. Genetic factors render certain individuals nonresponsive to v
accination. In general, in epidemiologic studies of adverse effects of expo
sure to agents in the environment in which vaccination titers are used, the
se additional factors need to be taken into consideration. Provided that th
ese factors are corrected for, a study that shows an association of exposur
e to a given agent with diminished vaccination responses may indicate subop
timal function of the immune system and clinically relevant diminished immu
ne response. It is quite unlikely that environmental exposures that affect
responses to vaccination may in fact abrogate protection to the specific pa
thogen for which vaccination was performed. Only in those cases where indiv
iduals have a poor response to the vaccine may exogenous factors perhaps ha
ve a clinically significant influence on resistance to the specific pathoge
n. An exposure-associated inhibition of a vaccination response may, however
, signify a decreased host resistance to pathogens against which no vaccina
tion had been performed.