Background: In women with breast cancer for whom breast-conserving therapy
(BCT) is not the best option, a nipple and areola complex-(NAC) sparing mas
tectomy with immediate reconstruction has been proposed as a good and safe
alternative to conventional, more radical mastectomy. Surgeons hesitate to
perform this operation for fear of recurrence of tumour in the NAC due to u
ndetected nipple involvement (NI) of the tumour. In order to determine whet
her a NAC-sparing mastectomy is a viable option, the frequency and predicti
ve factors of NI by the tumour were studied in the literature.
Methods: A literature survey was performed by searching the Medline databas
e. Other references were derived from the material perused.
Results and Conclusions: NI is found in up to 58% of mastectomy specimens a
nd correlates with tumour size, tumour-areola or tumour-nipple distance, po
sitive lymph nodes and clinical suspicion. Best candidates for NAC-sparing
mastectomy are patients with a small tumour (TI) at a large distance (>4-5
cm) from the nipple. However, in these patients BCT has excellent results w
ith low complications and recurrence rates. Considering the incidence of NI
in larger tumours (T2 average 33%, T3 average > 50%) a NAC-sparing mastect
omy may carry an unacceptable high risk for local relapse and should theref
ore not be advocated. (C) 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.