Human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in normogonadotropic women down-regulated with a gonadotropin-releasinghormone agonist who were undergoing in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective randomized study
Lg. Westergaard et al., Human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in normogonadotropic women down-regulated with a gonadotropin-releasinghormone agonist who were undergoing in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective randomized study, FERT STERIL, 76(3), 2001, pp. 543-549
Objective: To evaluate clinical and endocrinological effects of intranasal
(IN) vs. subcutaneous (SC) GnRH-a for pituitary down-regulation combined wi
th hMG vs. rFSH.
Design: Prospective, randomized study.
Setting: University hospital, IVF unit.
Patient(s): Three hundred seventy-nine normogonadotropic women eligible for
IVF or ICSI.
Intervention(s): Randomization to intranasal (IN) or SC GnRH-a and to hMG o
r rFSH.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Oocytes retrieved, embryos developed, clinical pre
gnancy, and delivery rates. Serum hormone concentrations on stimulation day
s 1 (S1) and 8 (S8), and oocyte pick-up (OPU) day.
Result(s): After randomization, four groups were formed: IN/hMG (n = 100),
IN/FSH (n = 98), SC/hMG (n = 89), and SC/FSH (n = 92). Mean number of oocyt
es retrieved and of transferable and transferred embryos were similar in th
e four groups. Clinical pregnancy rate per started cycle was significantly
higher in the IN/HMG group than in the SC/FSH group (P<.05) and was interme
diate in the two remaining groups. Se-LH on S8 in the two SC groups was sig
nificantly lower than in the two IN groups. Se-E2 on S8 in the SC/FSH group
was significantly lower than in the other three groups.
Conclusion(s): The clinical and endocrinological outcome in IVF and ICSI-tr
eated normogonadotropic women is significantly influenced by mode of down-r
egulation as well as gonadotropin formulation. (Fertil Steril(R) 2001;76:54
3-9. (C) 2001 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine).