The Freiburg Stereoacuity Test: automatic measurement of stereo threshold

Citation
M. Bach et al., The Freiburg Stereoacuity Test: automatic measurement of stereo threshold, GR ARCH CL, 239(8), 2001, pp. 562-566
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology
Journal title
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
ISSN journal
0721832X → ACNP
Volume
239
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
562 - 566
Database
ISI
SICI code
0721-832X(200108)239:8<562:TFSTAM>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Background: There is a need for a stereotest with the following properties: (1) Natural viewing conditions, i.e. stimulus contours visible for each ey e alone, but no or hardly any cue for monocular detection, and (2) suitabil ity for threshold determination over a wide range of disparities. To comply with these requirements, we developed the Freiburg Stereoacuity Test. Meth od: The stimulus configuration is shown on a visual display unit (VDU) usin g phase-difference haploscopy with ferromagnetic liquid crystal shutters. T he stereo target consists of a vertical bar that can be presented "in front of" or "behind" a frame. The sizes of the bar and the frame are kept const ant relative to the stereo disparity. Anti-aliasing allows for disparities finer than the pixel raster. To mask monocular cues the bar is displaced ra ndomly to the right or left. The stereo threshold was determined in two obs ervers with normal eyes, using first the method of constant stimuli and the n the best PEST. Both procedures were repeated with observers wearing scatt er transparencies that reduced their visual acuity to about 1/10. In additi on, the two observers with insight into the test design and two strabismic patients performed the best PEST procedure with one eye only. Results: With constant stimuli both observers achieved a stereoacuity of 2.6 arcsec and 3.1 arcsec, respectively, taking a hit rate of 75% as the threshold. The be st PEST revealed a stereoacuity of 2.5 arcsec and 3.0 arcsec, respectively. The scatter transparencies raised the threshold to 261 and 257, respective ly. With one eye only, the two observers with insight into the test design exploited the subtle position cue and reached a coarse pseudostereopsis. Th e two strabismic patients did not utilise the position cue. Conclusion: The Freiburg Stereoacuity Test allows determination of stereoacuity over a wid e range of disparities (1-1000 arcsec). Although the stimuli can be seen wi th each eye alone, monocular depth cues are sufficiently masked. The Freibu rg Stereoacuity Test is available at http://www.ukl.uni-frei-burg.de/aug/ba ch/fst/.