W. Hofmann et al., Environmental tobacco smoke deposition in the human respiratory tract: Differences between experimental and theoretical approaches, J AEROSOL M, 14(3), 2001, pp. 317-326
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG
Total deposition of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) particles was measure
d in a group of 15 nonsmokers who inhaled ETS of count median diameter of 0
.2 mum and geometric standard deviation of 1.6. A total deposition of 56.0
+/- 15.9% was observed for nasal breathing and 48.7 +/- 11.5% for oral brea
thing. In contrast, our stochastic deposition model predicted a total depos
ition of only 17.9% (male) and 15.7% (female) for nose breathing, and 13.4%
(male) and 10.7% (female) for mouth breathing, if based on standard breath
ing conditions. Consideration of individual lung volumes and breathing para
meters for each volunteer resulted in total deposition values of 16.9 +/- 2
.2% for nose breathing and 12.1 +/- 2.1% for mouth breathing. The apparent
discrepancy between experiment and modeling suggests that either single ETS
particles increase substantially in size upon inhalation (up to an order o
f magnitude) and/or additional physical mechanisms must be invoked that are
acting specifically upon ETS particles: (1) hygroscopic growth of ETS part
icles does not exceed 20-30%; (2) number concentrations in the ETS experime
nts (3.8 x 10(4), to 1.3 x 10(5) cm(-3)) are too low to increase particle s
ize by coagulation; (3) cast experiments indicate that electrical charge (i
mage forces) may play an important role, but theory predicts only an increa
se of 20-60%; and (4) cloud settling is unlikely to be a significant factor
at such low number concentrations. In conclusion, estimates of the magnitu
des of these potential effects demonstrate that none of these mechanisms al
one can be responsible for the significantly higher total ETS deposition ob
served in the experiments. This suggests that a combination of all these me
chanisms may be necessary to reconcile experimental and theoretical ETS dep
osition data, the most likely candidates being image forces and hygroscopic
growth.