Environmental tobacco smoke deposition in the human respiratory tract: Differences between experimental and theoretical approaches

Citation
W. Hofmann et al., Environmental tobacco smoke deposition in the human respiratory tract: Differences between experimental and theoretical approaches, J AEROSOL M, 14(3), 2001, pp. 317-326
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG
ISSN journal
08942684 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
317 - 326
Database
ISI
SICI code
0894-2684(200123)14:3<317:ETSDIT>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Total deposition of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) particles was measure d in a group of 15 nonsmokers who inhaled ETS of count median diameter of 0 .2 mum and geometric standard deviation of 1.6. A total deposition of 56.0 +/- 15.9% was observed for nasal breathing and 48.7 +/- 11.5% for oral brea thing. In contrast, our stochastic deposition model predicted a total depos ition of only 17.9% (male) and 15.7% (female) for nose breathing, and 13.4% (male) and 10.7% (female) for mouth breathing, if based on standard breath ing conditions. Consideration of individual lung volumes and breathing para meters for each volunteer resulted in total deposition values of 16.9 +/- 2 .2% for nose breathing and 12.1 +/- 2.1% for mouth breathing. The apparent discrepancy between experiment and modeling suggests that either single ETS particles increase substantially in size upon inhalation (up to an order o f magnitude) and/or additional physical mechanisms must be invoked that are acting specifically upon ETS particles: (1) hygroscopic growth of ETS part icles does not exceed 20-30%; (2) number concentrations in the ETS experime nts (3.8 x 10(4), to 1.3 x 10(5) cm(-3)) are too low to increase particle s ize by coagulation; (3) cast experiments indicate that electrical charge (i mage forces) may play an important role, but theory predicts only an increa se of 20-60%; and (4) cloud settling is unlikely to be a significant factor at such low number concentrations. In conclusion, estimates of the magnitu des of these potential effects demonstrate that none of these mechanisms al one can be responsible for the significantly higher total ETS deposition ob served in the experiments. This suggests that a combination of all these me chanisms may be necessary to reconcile experimental and theoretical ETS dep osition data, the most likely candidates being image forces and hygroscopic growth.