OBJECTIVE. Residents frequently use humor and slang at the expense of patie
nts on the clinical wards. We studied how medical students react to and int
erpret the "appropriateness" of derogatory and cynical humor and slang in a
clinical setting.
DESIGN. Semistructured, in-depth interviews.
SETTING. Informal meeting spaces.
PARTICIPANTS. Thirty-three medical students.
MEASUREMENTS: Qualitative content analysis of interview transcriptions.
MAIN RESULTS: Students' descriptions of the humorous stories and their resp
onses reveal that students are able to take the perspective of both outside
rs and insiders in the medical culture. Students' responses to these storie
s show that they can identify the outsider's perspective both by seeing the
mselves in the outsider's role and by identifying with patients. Students c
an also see the insider's perspective, in that they identify with residents
' frustrations and disappointments and therefore try to explain why residen
ts use this kind of humor. Their participation in the humor and slang-often
with reservations-further reveals their ability to identify with the persp
ective of an insider.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical students describe a number of conflicting reactions to
hospital humor that may enhance and exacerbate tensions that are already a
n inevitable part of training for many students. This phenomenon requires g
reater attention by medical educators.