We propose a model for evaluating the quality of dying and death based on c
oncepts elicited from. literature review, qualitative interviews with perso
ns with and without chronic and terminal conditions, and consideration of d
esirable measurement properties. We define quality of dying and death as th
e degree to which a person's preferences for dying and the moment of death
agree with observations of how the person actually died, as reported by oth
ers. Expected level of agreement is modified by circumstances surrounding d
eath that may prevent following patient's Prior Preferences. Qualitative da
ta analysis yielded six conceptual domains: Symptoms and personal care, pre
paration for death, moment of death, family, treatment preferences, and who
le person concerns. These domains encompass 31 aspects that can be rated by
patients and others as to their importance prior to death and assessed by
significant others or clinicians after death to assess the quality of the d
ying experience. The proposed model uses personal preferences about the dyi
ng experience to inform evaluation of this experience by others after death
. This operational definition will guide validation of after-death reports
of the quality of dying experience and evaluation of interventions to impro
ve quality of end-of-life care. (C) U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee, 2001
.