The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of th
e Toolkit After-Death Bereaved Family Member Interview to measure quality o
f care at the end of life from the unique Perspective of family members. Th
e survey included proposed problem scores (a count of the opportunity to im
prove the quality of care) and scales. Data were collected through a retros
pective telephone survey with a family member who was interviewed between 3
and 6 months after the death of the patient. The setting was an outpatient
hospice service, a consortium of nursing homes, and a hospital in New Engl
and. One hundred fifty-six family members from across these settings partic
ipated. The 8 proposed domains of care, as represented by problem scores or
scales, were based on a conceptual model of patient-focused, family-center
ed medical care. The survey design emphasized face validity in order to pro
vide actionable information to healthy care providers. A correlational and
factor analysis was undertaken of the 8 proposed problem scores or scales.
Cronbach's alpha scores varied from 0.58 to 0.87, with two problem scores (
each of which had only 3 survey items) having a low alpha of 0.58. The mean
item-to-total correlations for the other problem scores varied from 0.36 t
o 0.69, and the mean item-to-item correlations were between 0.32 and 0.70.
The proposed problem scares or scales, with the exception of closure and ad
vance care planning, demonstrated a moderate correlation (i.e., from 0.44 t
o 0.52) with the overall rating of satisfaction (as measured by a five-poin
t, "excellent" to "poor" scale). Family members of persons who died with ho
spice service reported fewer problems in each of the six domains of medical
care, gave a higher rating of the quality of care, and reported higher sel
f-efficacy in caring for their loved ones. These results indicate that 7 of
the 8 proposed problem scores or scales demonstrated psychometric properti
es that warrant further testing. The domain of closure demonstrated a poor
correlation with overall satisfaction and requires further work. This surve
y could provide information to help guide quality improvement efforts to en
hance the care of the dying. (C) U. S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee, 2001.