Both airborne in situ and ground-based remote sensing methods are used
to measure the properties of urban/industrial aerosols during the Sul
fate Clouds and Radiation-Atlantic (SCAR-A) experiment in 1993. Airbor
ne in situ methods directly measure aerosol characteristics such as si
ze distribution and scattering coefficient at a particular altitude an
d infer the total column optical properties, such as optical thickness
. Ground-based remote sensing is sensitive to the aerosol optical prop
erties of the entire column and infers the physical properties from in
version of sky radiance. Comparison of optical thickness measurements
are encouraging but inconclusive because of measured profiles which ex
tend no higher than 2 km. By comparing aerosol volume size distributio
ns we find that the two systems are in agreement in the radius size ra
nge 0.05-2 mu m, after the stratospheric aerosol mode is removed from
the remote sensing data. At larger aerosol sizes both systems suffer f
rom greater uncertainty, and the larger aerosols themselves are less s
patially uniform because of their short lifetimes. The combination of
factors makes the comparison at larger radii impossible. The disadvant
ages of the in situ systems are that there is a measuring efficiency f
or each device which is dependent on aerosol size and that airborne in
situ measurements are rare events in time and space. Also, in situ in
struments dry the aerosol before measurement. Automatic remote sensing
procedures measure the total column ambient aerosol unaffected by dry
ing or sampling issues, and these instruments can be installed globall
y to make observations many times per day. However, the disadvantages
to remote sensing are that the inferred physical properties are depend
ent on the assumptions and numerical limitations of the inversion proc
edures. The favorable comparison between the two types of measurement
systems suggests that these drawbacks are manageable in both cases.