Rm. Gupta et al., Postoperative complications in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome undergoing hip or knee replacement: A case-control study, MAYO CLIN P, 76(9), 2001, pp. 897-905
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Objective: To identify and assess the impact of postoperative complications
in patients with unrecognized or known obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (O
SAS) undergoing hip replacement or knee replacement compared with control p
atients undergoing similar operations. Although OSAS is a risk factor for p
erioperative morbidity,, data quantifying the magnitude of the problem in p
atients undergoing non-upper airway operations are limited.
Patients and Methods: This retrospective, case-control study from a single
academic medical institution included patients diagnosed as having OSAS bet
ween January 1995 and December 1998 and undergoing hip or knee replacement
within 3 years before or anytime after their OSAS diagnosis. Patients with
OSAS were subcategorized as having the diagnosis either before or after the
surgery and also, regardless of time of diagnosis, by whether they were us
ing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) prior to hospitalization. Ma
tched controls were patients without OSAS undergoing the same operation. In
terventions were defined specifically as administration of a particular tre
atment in the context of each complication, eg, supplemental oxygen, implem
entation of additional monitoring such as oximetry for hypoxemia, or transf
er to the intensive care unit (ICU) for cardiac ischemia concerns. Postoper
ative complications were assessed for all patients in the different categor
ies and included respiratory events such as hypoxemia, acute hypercapnia, a
nd episodes of delirium. Serious complications were noted separately, inclu
ding unplanned ICU days, reintubations, and cardiac events. The length of h
ospital stay was also tabulated.
Results: There were 101 patients with the diagnosis of OSAS in this study a
nd 101 matched controls. Thirty-six patients had their joint replacement be
fore OSAS was diagnosed, and 65 had surgery after OSAS was diagnosed. Of th
e latter 65 patients, only 33 were using CPAP at home preoperatively. Compl
ications were noted in 39 patients (39%) in the OSAS group and 18 patients
(18%) in the control group (P=.001). Serious complications occurred in 24 p
atients (24%) in the OSAS group compared with 9 patients (9%) in the contro
l group (P=.004). Hospital stay was significantly longer for the OSAS patie
nts at a mean SD of 6.8 +/-2.8 days compared with 5.1 +/-4.1 days for the c
ontrol patients (P < .007).
Conclusion: Adverse postoperative outcomes occurred at a higher rate in pat
ients with a diagnosis of OSAS undergoing hip or knee replacement compared
with a group of matched control patients.