Comparison of transdermal and oral estrogen-progestin replacement therapy:effects on cardiovascular risk factors

Citation
Fp. Chen et al., Comparison of transdermal and oral estrogen-progestin replacement therapy:effects on cardiovascular risk factors, MENOPAUSE, 8(5), 2001, pp. 347-352
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY
ISSN journal
10723714 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
347 - 352
Database
ISI
SICI code
1072-3714(200109/10)8:5<347:COTAOE>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Objective: To determine the effects of oral and transdermal hormone replace ment therapy on lipid profile and hemostatic factors in postmenopausal wome n. Design: Twenty subjects were treated with oral E-2 valerate (2 mg) combined with cyproterone acetate (1 mg) (group I) and 21 with transdermal E-2 (1.5 mg) plus oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (5 mg) (group II). The effects o n lipid profile and hemostatic parameters were evaluated at baseline and af ter 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment. Results: Group I showed a stronger increase of high-density lipoprotein (HD L) cholesterol levels (2-8%) and stronger reduction of atherogenic indices (total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein/HDL choleste rol) than group Il. Group II showed a more pronounced reduction of triglyce ride (21-31%) and factor VII (6-10%) levels than group I. Both groups showe d reduced concentrations of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein chol esterol, tissue plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, a ntithrombin III, and protein S, whereas protein C was increased after 12 mo nths of treatment. Conclusions: The cardioprotective effects of hormone replacement therapy ar e demonstrated by favorable effects on lipid profile and fibrinolytic activ ity. Oral hormone replacement therapy showed a more prominent effect on lip oprotein metabolism than did transdermal administration, but transdermal me dication had a stronger effect on triglyceride and coagulation factors. How ever, it needs to be considered that there is an increased risk of venous t hrombotic events in the first year of treatment.