Cj. Corbett, Stochastic inventory systems in a supply chain with asymmetric information: Cycle stocks, safety stocks, and consignment stock, OPERAT RES, 49(4), 2001, pp. 487-500
The two critical factors distinguishing inventory management in a multifirm
supply-chain context from the more traditional centrally planned perspecti
ve are incentive conflicts and information asymmetries. We study the well-k
nown order quantity/reorder point (Q, r) model in a two-player context, usi
ng a framework inspired by observations during a case study. We show how tr
aditional allocations of decision rights to supplier and buyer lead to inef
ficient outcomes, and we use principal-agent models to study the effects of
information asymmetries about setup cost and backorder cost, respectively.
We analyze two "opposite" models of contracting on inventory policies. Firs
t, we derive the buyer's optimal menu of contracts when the supplier has pr
ivate information about setup cost, and we show how consignment stock can h
elp reduce the impact of this information asymmetry. Next, we study consign
ment and assume the supplier cannot observe the buyer's backorder cost. We
derive the supplier's optimal menu of contracts on consigned stock level an
d show that in this case, the supplier effectively has to overcompensate th
e buyer for the cost of each stockout.
Our theoretical analysis and the case study suggest that consignment stock
helps reduce cycle stock by providing the supplier with an additional incen
tive to decrease batch size, but simultaneously gives the buyer an incentiv
e to increase safety stock by exaggerating backorder costs. This framework
immediately points to practical recommendations on how supply-chain incenti
ves should be realigned to overcome existing information asymmetries.