Myofascial trigger points (TrPs) have been clinically described as discrete
areas of muscle tenderness presenting in taut bands of skeletal muscle. Us
ing well-defined clinical criteria, prior investigations have demonstrated
interrater reliability in the diagnosis of TrPs within a given muscle. No r
eports exist, however, with respect to the precision with which experienced
clinicians can determine the anatomic locations of TrPs within a muscle. T
his paper details a study wherein four trained clinicians achieved statisti
cally significant reliability (see below) in estimating the precise locatio
ns of latent TrPs in the trapezius muscle of volunteer subjects (n = 20). T
o do so, the clinicians trained extensively together prior to the study. Th
e precise anatomic location of each subject's primary TrP was measured in a
blinded fashion using a 3 dimensional (3-D) camera system. Use of this mea
surement system permitted the anatomic co-ordinates of each TrP to be locat
ed without providing feedback to subsequent clinicians. The clinicians each
used a pressure algometer along with patient feedback to document the sens
itivity of each suspected TrP site, however unlike routine clinical practic
e, the algometry was performed with a double-blinded approach hence the res
ults were only examined post-hoc. At the time of data collection (algometry
readings unknown), 16 of the 20 subjects were judged to present with a lat
ent TrP. Subsequently, when subjected to a criterion pressure threshold val
ue of <3.0 kg.cm, 12 of these TrPs were classified as being clinically sens
itive. To assess the 3-D measurement precision, and the reliability of the
TrP estimates, statistical measures of the SEM and the Generalizability coe
fficient (G-coeff) were determined for all suspected TrP sites in the super
ior-inferior, medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions. The best re
sults were determined by pooling the measurements of all 4 clinicians, howe
ver, based upon exceeding a criterion reliability threshold of 80%, the use
of just two testers was found to produce reliable results. The two-tester
condition yielded a precision of 7.5, 7.6 and 6.5 mm. (SEM) with reliabilit
y (G-coeff) of 0.92, 0.86 and 0.83, respectively. Given the double-blinded
methodology, the use of pressure algometry was also found to demonstrate in
ternal validity. The algometer responses associated with TrP estimates vari
ed inversely with respect to the clinical group's reliability in identify t
he TrP locations. To summarize, for the trapezius muscle, this study demons
trates that two trained examiners can reliably localize latent TrPs with a
precision that essentially approaches the physical dimensions of the clinic
ian's own fingertips. Finally, it should be recognized that the ability to
precisely document TrP location appears critical to the success of future s
tudies that may be designed to investigate the etiology and pathogenesis of
this commonly diagnosed clinical disorder. <(c)> 2001 International Associ
ation for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights
reserved.